News

FCCPC Shuts Ikeja Electric Headquarters Over Prolonged Consumer Rights Violations 

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has sealed the headquarters of electricity distribution company, Ikeja Electric (IE), for the prolonged violation of consumer rights.

The FCCPC disclosed this on Thursday, noting that IE had failed to comply with directives issued by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) and the FCCPC itself.

According to the Commission, NERC had issued a binding decision directing Ikeja Electric to unbundle a Maximum Demand account into twenty non-Maximum Demand accounts, to recognise each of the nineteen residential units and a service point owned by a complainant as separate customer units, and to provide the required metering and connection.

“Ikeja Electric did not carry out that decision,” the Commission stated, disclosing that because of this failure, the complainant has been without electricity supply for more than two and a half years.

“This was despite paying all charges requested by Ikeja Electric and meeting every obligation. The lack of electricity has prevented the complainant from putting the nineteen residential units to use.”

The FCCPC revealed that it engaged Ikeja Electric several times and notified the company of the complaint and the outstanding NERC decision. The Commission recalled that in April 2025, it issued a directive that set out the steps required and the timelines for compliance.

“No action was taken. On 2nd October 2025, the Commission issued a Compliance Notice requiring full compliance within seven business days. The company still did not comply,” it said.

The Commission highlighted the FCCPA’s legal framework for the intervention, including:

– Section 17 sets out the Commission’s functions. These include resolving complaints, issuing directives, and taking enforcement action where breaches continue.

– Section 18 gives the Commission the powers required to ensure compliance with the Act. This includes taking enforcement steps such as sealing premises where an undertaking’s conduct has created or prolonged consumer harm.

– Section 124 prohibits harassment, coercion, undue influence or unfair tactics in the supply of goods or services. Withholding or frustrating access to a service in circumstances that cause avoidable hardship falls within this prohibition.

– Section 150 allows the Commission to issue a Compliance Notice that specifies the steps an undertaking must take to remedy a contravention. It also permits escalation where the undertaking ignores the notice.

– Section 155 makes it an offence for an undertaking to infringe consumer rights.

It reiterated that these provisions provide the statutory basis for the action, adding that Ikeja Electric’s sustained refusal to carry out a lawful regulatory decision, together with the prolonged deprivation of electricity to nineteen residential units, meets the threshold for intervention.

The Commission explained that sealing the facility is a proportionate enforcement measure taken only after repeated engagement and several opportunities for voluntary compliance.

“The seal will remain in place until Ikeja Electric complies fully with the directives issued by both NERC and the FCCPC and provides written evidence of that compliance. Consumers are entitled to fair treatment and timely access to essential services.”

It further stated that it will continue to enforce the law to protect these rights and to ensure that service providers meet their obligations.

ThelensNG

Hope Ejairu

Hope Ejairu is a writer, sports analyst and journalist, with publications in print and digital media. He holds certifications in various media/journalism trainings, including AFP.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Turn off Your Ad Blocker to continue browsing this site.